basseek.blogg.se

1. SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 ENGINEERING STYLE INSTALL
2. SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 ENGINEERING STYLE SOFTWARE

SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 ENGINEERING STYLE INSTALL

Plugin's that have to come from the CD internet or any other place where the program gets installed in a seperate or integrated into the install procedure way should be flagged with something.

SKETCHUP VERSION 15.3.331 ENGINEERING STYLE SOFTWARE

Plugins that come with the software but are packaged and have to be unpacked or 'installed' should also count. And not counting plug ins that can be installed at any time but don't get delivered when the program is installed.

Maybe it's best to draw the line to what's delivered when installing. 74.85.42.110 ( talk) 02:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Adding the available architectures the software runs on sounds like a necessary thing in such a comparison. The problem with something like that is where do you draw the line on features? The first challenge would be deciding if after market plug-ins count as features? BcRIPster ( talk) 01:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC) The Comparison of vector graphics editors article has a similar structure to what I'd like to see here. Someone put it in and never developed it. Something really exhausting: import/export formats?ħ4.85.42.110 ( talk) 01:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC) I'm not really sure what the idea was behind adding that section. Is someone planning on filling in the "features" section? Some random thoughts on that: Should the Operating System section (or a new section) also mention on what CPU architectures it runs? I just removed some erroneous data regarding Linux systems, especially since it is trivial to extract a package built for one distro and run it on another - although satisfying dependencies may take a little work.